Tuesday, November 26, 2019
Campaign Finance v. Freedom of Speech
We've spent a lot of time the last few weeks talking about campaign finance and how the Citizens United v. FEC case impacted the future of elections to come. The decision on the case is really controversial, as the Supreme Court ruled that the government cannot limit free speech, and by limiting the amount of money any individual or corporation is allowed to give to a campaign or candidate, they would be limiting free speech. On one hand, I agree that the government should not be infringing on free speech, but I also really see how this can affect politics heavily. If the wealthy are allowed to give unlimited amounts of money to whoever they want, the candidates who promise to help the wealthy are always going to have an unfair advantage. I'm not really sure how to feel about this decision, because I can see and understand both sides of the debate. What do you think?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
How Fast Fashion is Destroying the Environment and Exploits Workers
Fast fashion is cheap clothing that is mass-produced in order to be trendy and more fashionable. This clothing is essentially disposable as ...
-
American culture tends to worship celebrities, as seen in the OJ documentary. OJ becomes god-like to all Americans, transcending even his ow...
-
501(c) organizations are nonprofit organizations that have been approved by the Internal Revenue Service as a tax-exempt, charitable organiz...
-
The Church Committee was formally known as the U.S. Senate Select Committee to Study Governmental Operations with Respect to Intelligence Ac...
I think that this is an interesting issue because these outside groups can influence the local elections greatly on behalf of their donors. But also I believe that the government should not do more to intervene in elections. The candidates are able to still get help from donors, but doing anything more be infringing on people's first amendment rights. The people are the ones that are voting for these people and so supporting the candidates allow the people to see what information is important to the people that they might potentially vote for. Also a majority of Americans are not filthy rich, so letting wealthy individuals spend money to push they candidate that they want to win is more beneficial for everyone else.
ReplyDelete*less
ReplyDelete